
The commercial music industry is astonishingly young. So why do we let it decide what a musician is worth?
There is a particular myth that has seduced generations of artists. It gets told loudly, repeated often, and marketed with a shine just glossy enough to distract us from how hollow it is.
It goes something like this:
“If you’re good enough, and lucky enough, you’ll get discovered. The right deal, the right audience, the right numbers, and you’ll make it.”
But here is a truth that doesn't get talked about enough: the commercial music industry, the one that defines so many of our ideas of “success”, is astonishingly young.
Radio began in earnest only in the 1920s. Major labels consolidated in the post-war boom. Streaming is barely two decades old. And yet somehow this relatively new architecture has become the dominant lens through which millions of musicians view their worth.
The damage this myth has done, especially to artists who carry deeper legacies, spiritual lineages, or healing practices, is vast. It is time we interrogate it.
Before the industry: music was ceremony
Before streaming platforms and stage lights, music held a very different function.
It was not designed for algorithms. It did not seek to entertain. It was not branded. It was medicine.
In countless cultures, from the shamanic rituals of Central Asia to the Vedic sound practices of the Indian subcontinent, music was a sacred tool. It served to align, to transform, to heal.
“In Yogic traditions, sound is not just expressive, it is generative. The universe itself is said to have emerged from nāda, the primal vibration.”
Beck, 2006; Ruckert, 2004
The Bauls of Bengal sang not for fame, but to awaken spiritual truths. Sufi mystics used rhythm to enter states of ecstasy. Shamans across Siberia, Africa, and the Americas journeyed through drum and chant, not for applause, but for communal healing.
This was music as ritual. Music as alignment. Music as responsibility.
From sacred craft to mass product
The industrial age rewired that. Music became mass-produced. Artists became brands. A new set of gatekeepers emerged, first A&R reps, then radio programmers, and now platform algorithms.
“The record industry has always been more interested in creating stars than sustaining artists.”
Negus, 1992
And as the gatekeepers shape-shift, the outcome remains the same. Artists become collateral damage. They are told to stay “on trend”, stay “relevant”, stay “visible”. And when they burn out, they are often discarded, forgotten, replaced.
Same game, new gods
The modern creator economy may wear cooler clothes, but it still runs on the same fuel: attention.
Now the label might be you, your brand, or your content output. But the question remains unchanged.
Are you generating numbers? Not: are you aligned with your calling? Not: are you in service to something greater than your ego? Not even: is the art any good?
The result is widespread burnout. Confusion around purpose. A generation of sensitive creatives trying to keep up with a machine that never stops spinning.
“Artists often lose access to their inner voice under the pressure of external validation.”
McIntyre, 2021
Coming back home
But I would like to think something is shifting. A new wave of artists are beginning to see through the illusion.
They are diversifying their practices. They are composing, teaching, healing, facilitating, scoring, collaborating, improvising, not because they failed, but because they remembered.
That a “career” in a conventional sense of the word was never really the point. That an artistic practice is not a ladder but a ritual space. That the work we do is not linear, it is seasonal. Cyclical. Devotional.
And this is not a retreat into obscurity. It is a return to wholeness.
Five practical suggestions for a sustainable music career
The idea here is to build from the inside out, instead of the other way round.
- Identify who you’re for. Most artists unconsciously shape their output around someone else’s expectations, an old teacher, a parent, the algorithm, or an outdated version of “success”. But that is not who your audience is. Write down: “Who am I still trying to impress, and why?” Then: “What would my output look like if I wasn’t?” This cuts the noise at the root and creates space for your actual artistic voice to surface.
- Choose one daily ritual to stabilise your nervous system. No sustainability without regulation. Pick one. Ten minutes of breath-led movement, like walking without your phone. A single practice you return to every morning, no agenda, a scale or a rhythm exercise. A five-minute voice or body scan before checking your phone. This is not luxury. It is infrastructure.
- Set a weekly creative audit check-in, fifteen minutes only. Every seven days, ask: did I make anything this week that felt true to me? Did I say yes to anything that drained me, and why? Is what I’m working on feeding or depleting my practice? Put it on your calendar. No excuses. This builds sovereignty like nothing else.
- Unfollow or mute five accounts that trigger anxiety. This sounds superficial. It is not. Your nervous system learns from repetition. If your feed teaches it that success equals loud, fast, constant, and shiny, you will abandon your real rhythm. Do this right now. It is one of the fastest ways to reclaim creative authority.
- Reframe your “career” as a spiritual discipline for the next ninety days. For three months, stop asking “is this working?”, “will this sell?”, “am I visible enough?” And ask instead: “did I practise with integrity today?”, “am I growing in mastery or just performance?”, “would I still do this if no one was watching?” This is how you reconnect to music as a path, not a product.
Success reimagined
There is nothing wrong with visibility. Or ambition. Or wanting to make a living through your art. But when we build our sense of worth on myths designed by industries that never cared for us, we lose something precious: ourselves.
The work of an artist is not to chase the noise, but to tune the instrument within, to reclaim music as a living, breathing, evolving practice.
Because a “music career” might come and go. But a music practice is meant to last a lifetime.
References
- Beck, G.L. (2006). Sacred Sound: Experiencing Music in World Religions. Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
- Ruckert, G. (2004). Music in North India: Experiencing Music, Expressing Culture. Oxford University Press.
- Negus, K. (1992). Producing Pop: Culture and Conflict in the Popular Music Industry. Edward Arnold.
- McIntyre, P. (2021). Research on creativity, autonomy and external validation in creative practice. Full source to be confirmed before publication.
Join my free training.

0 Comments